Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa

60.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1.741285.1%17.2%(-12.1)#1313.7%(-8.62)#1,139
2.741045.2%17.2%(-12.0)#1413.7%(-8.50)#1,172
3.741337.6%17.2%(-9.56)#3513.7%(-6.11)#2,067
4.7414511.0%17.2%(-6.14)#5913.7%(-2.68)#3,338
5.7413514.0%17.2%(-3.21)#7813.7%(+0.241)#4,267
6.7412914.4%17.2%(-2.73)#8213.7%(+0.721)#4,420
7.7411414.5%17.2%(-2.68)#8313.7%(+0.770)#4,427
8.7413014.6%17.2%(-2.58)#8413.7%(+0.871)#4,459
9.7413415.6%17.2%(-1.55)#9313.7%(+1.90)#4,729
10.7411518.9%17.2%(+1.70)#11913.7%(+5.15)#5,587
11.7412722.8%17.2%(+5.62)#14313.7%(+9.07)#6,488
12.7410723.0%17.2%(+5.88)#14413.7%(+9.33)#6,536
13.7410827.0%17.2%(+9.79)#17113.7%(+13.2)#7,304
14.7413627.2%17.2%(+9.99)#17213.7%(+13.4)#7,332
15.7411227.4%17.2%(+10.2)#17613.7%(+13.7)#7,385
16.7410629.7%17.2%(+12.5)#18413.7%(+16.0)#7,748
17.7411030.3%17.2%(+13.2)#18713.7%(+16.6)#7,851
18.7412633.1%17.2%(+15.9)#19613.7%(+19.4)#8,199
19.7410544.0%17.2%(+26.8)#24013.7%(+30.3)#9,343
20.7411955.0%17.2%(+37.8)#26813.7%(+41.3)#10,085
21.7411659.2%17.2%(+42.0)#27613.7%(+45.4)#10,305

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
0.0%
#5
0.0%
#6
5.1%
#7
5.2%
#8
7.6%
#9
11.0%
#10
14.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
74128 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK with 5.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa is 18.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma is 17.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.