Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Seniors 65+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Senior Poverty vs State vs National
1.74103100.0%9.5%(+90.5)#110.0%(+90.0)#5
2.7411024.2%9.5%(+14.7)#4910.0%(+14.3)#2,483
3.7410618.7%9.5%(+9.21)#9310.0%(+8.78)#4,249
4.7414617.0%9.5%(+7.49)#11710.0%(+7.06)#5,159
5.7410417.0%9.5%(+7.47)#11810.0%(+7.04)#5,168
6.7411516.8%9.5%(+7.23)#12310.0%(+6.80)#5,328
7.7412915.1%9.5%(+5.62)#15910.0%(+5.19)#6,459
8.7412613.3%9.5%(+3.82)#19010.0%(+3.40)#8,018
9.7410712.6%9.5%(+3.11)#20910.0%(+2.68)#8,779
10.7412712.4%9.5%(+2.89)#21510.0%(+2.46)#9,052
11.7411211.9%9.5%(+2.34)#23710.0%(+1.91)#9,696
12.7411610.3%9.5%(+0.756)#28510.0%(+0.326)#11,955
13.741199.4%9.5%(-0.092)#31810.0%(-0.521)#13,394
14.741289.3%9.5%(-0.205)#32110.0%(-0.634)#13,599
15.741089.1%9.5%(-0.396)#32910.0%(-0.825)#13,905
16.741308.1%9.5%(-1.47)#37310.0%(-1.89)#15,903
17.741348.0%9.5%(-1.54)#37910.0%(-1.97)#16,060
18.741057.6%9.5%(-1.92)#39210.0%(-2.35)#16,810
19.741316.6%9.5%(-2.96)#43910.0%(-3.39)#19,025
20.741356.5%9.5%(-3.00)#44110.0%(-3.43)#19,102
21.741336.5%9.5%(-3.01)#44310.0%(-3.44)#19,131
22.741146.1%9.5%(-3.40)#45810.0%(-3.83)#19,908
23.741365.9%9.5%(-3.64)#47110.0%(-4.07)#20,428
24.741455.7%9.5%(-3.84)#47710.0%(-4.27)#20,904
25.741374.7%9.5%(-4.86)#51110.0%(-5.28)#23,012
26.741204.5%9.5%(-4.98)#51710.0%(-5.41)#23,274
27.741322.4%9.5%(-7.10)#57210.0%(-7.53)#26,680

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
100.0%
#2
24.2%
#3
18.7%
#4
17.0%
#5
17.0%
#6
16.8%
#7
15.1%
#8
13.3%
#9
12.6%
#10
12.4%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Tulsa is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in Oklahoma is 9.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Seniors Over the Age of 65 in the United States is 10.0%.