Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa

50.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.7413211.5%29.8%(-18.4)#3724.1%(-12.6)#4,202
2.7412012.2%29.8%(-17.6)#4224.1%(-11.9)#4,636
3.7411413.7%29.8%(-16.1)#5924.1%(-10.3)#5,545
4.7411914.3%29.8%(-15.6)#6424.1%(-9.79)#5,819
5.7413714.8%29.8%(-15.1)#7224.1%(-9.30)#6,130
6.7413318.9%29.8%(-11.0)#10624.1%(-5.21)#8,561
7.7413420.5%29.8%(-9.31)#13024.1%(-3.54)#9,518
8.7410423.4%29.8%(-6.45)#15324.1%(-0.683)#11,116
9.7414524.6%29.8%(-5.26)#16724.1%(+0.508)#11,751
10.7411224.9%29.8%(-4.94)#16924.1%(+0.828)#11,900
11.7413526.7%29.8%(-3.17)#18924.1%(+2.60)#12,940
12.7411629.5%29.8%(-0.382)#22924.1%(+5.39)#14,354
13.7413632.7%29.8%(+2.82)#27124.1%(+8.59)#15,739
14.7412832.7%29.8%(+2.87)#27324.1%(+8.64)#15,762
15.7410535.9%29.8%(+6.07)#31524.1%(+11.8)#17,066
16.7411536.6%29.8%(+6.71)#32524.1%(+12.5)#17,279
17.7413036.8%29.8%(+6.92)#33024.1%(+12.7)#17,346
18.7410737.4%29.8%(+7.51)#34124.1%(+13.3)#17,537
19.7412638.5%29.8%(+8.61)#35324.1%(+14.4)#17,882
20.7412738.8%29.8%(+8.94)#35824.1%(+14.7)#17,991
21.7414638.9%29.8%(+9.07)#36024.1%(+14.8)#18,031
22.7410839.4%29.8%(+9.55)#36624.1%(+15.3)#18,173
23.7412940.0%29.8%(+10.1)#37224.1%(+15.9)#18,313
24.7410641.7%29.8%(+11.9)#38424.1%(+17.6)#18,885
25.7413143.8%29.8%(+13.9)#41224.1%(+19.7)#19,383
26.7411049.0%29.8%(+19.1)#45024.1%(+24.9)#20,464

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
11.5%
#2
12.2%
#3
13.7%
#4
14.3%
#5
14.8%
#6
18.9%
#7
20.5%
#8
23.4%
#9
24.6%
#10
24.9%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK with 11.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa is 32.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.