Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa

0.0%
50.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411049.0%29.8%(+19.1)#10424.1%(+24.9)#3,673
2.7413143.8%29.8%(+13.9)#14324.1%(+19.7)#4,741
3.7410641.7%29.8%(+11.9)#17024.1%(+17.6)#5,252
4.7412940.0%29.8%(+10.1)#18224.1%(+15.9)#5,824
5.7410839.4%29.8%(+9.55)#18824.1%(+15.3)#5,964
6.7414638.9%29.8%(+9.07)#19424.1%(+14.8)#6,106
7.7412738.8%29.8%(+8.94)#19624.1%(+14.7)#6,146
8.7412638.5%29.8%(+8.61)#19824.1%(+14.4)#6,231
9.7410737.4%29.8%(+7.51)#21324.1%(+13.3)#6,600
10.7413036.8%29.8%(+6.92)#22424.1%(+12.7)#6,791
11.7411536.6%29.8%(+6.71)#22824.1%(+12.5)#6,857
12.7410535.9%29.8%(+6.07)#23924.1%(+11.8)#7,071
13.7412832.7%29.8%(+2.87)#28124.1%(+8.64)#8,375
14.7413632.7%29.8%(+2.82)#28324.1%(+8.59)#8,398
15.7411629.5%29.8%(-0.382)#32524.1%(+5.39)#9,784
16.7413526.7%29.8%(-3.17)#36524.1%(+2.60)#11,197
17.7411224.9%29.8%(-4.94)#38524.1%(+0.828)#12,237
18.7414524.6%29.8%(-5.26)#38724.1%(+0.508)#12,386
19.7410423.4%29.8%(-6.45)#40124.1%(-0.683)#13,021
20.7413420.5%29.8%(-9.31)#42424.1%(-3.54)#14,619
21.7413318.9%29.8%(-11.0)#44824.1%(-5.21)#15,576
22.7413714.8%29.8%(-15.1)#48224.1%(-9.30)#18,007
23.7411914.3%29.8%(-15.6)#48524.1%(-9.79)#18,246
24.7411413.7%29.8%(-16.1)#49524.1%(-10.3)#18,593
25.7412012.2%29.8%(-17.6)#51224.1%(-11.9)#19,501
26.7413211.5%29.8%(-18.4)#51724.1%(-12.6)#19,935

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
49.0%
#2
43.8%
#3
41.7%
#4
40.0%
#5
39.4%
#6
38.9%
#7
38.8%
#8
38.5%
#9
37.4%
#10
36.8%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK with 49.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Tulsa is 32.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Oklahoma is 29.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.