Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa

0.0%
40.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411639.5%15.8%(+23.8)#6912.4%(+27.1)#2,694
2.7410630.9%15.8%(+15.1)#10412.4%(+18.5)#3,802
3.7410728.5%15.8%(+12.7)#11412.4%(+16.1)#4,245
4.7410527.4%15.8%(+11.6)#12412.4%(+15.0)#4,455
5.7412627.0%15.8%(+11.2)#12712.4%(+14.5)#4,558
6.7411224.3%15.8%(+8.56)#15412.4%(+11.9)#5,196
7.7411523.5%15.8%(+7.71)#16412.4%(+11.0)#5,419
8.7413422.4%15.8%(+6.59)#17512.4%(+9.92)#5,734
9.7411421.2%15.8%(+5.43)#18612.4%(+8.76)#6,075
10.7410819.9%15.8%(+4.12)#20612.4%(+7.45)#6,549
11.7413618.6%15.8%(+2.85)#21412.4%(+6.18)#6,968
12.7411017.9%15.8%(+2.16)#22812.4%(+5.50)#7,241
13.7413016.5%15.8%(+0.688)#25312.4%(+4.02)#7,836
14.7412915.2%15.8%(-0.605)#27012.4%(+2.73)#8,363
15.7412714.7%15.8%(-1.04)#27612.4%(+2.30)#8,544
16.7411914.7%15.8%(-1.10)#27712.4%(+2.23)#8,580
17.7412814.6%15.8%(-1.12)#27812.4%(+2.21)#8,585
18.7413512.6%15.8%(-3.17)#30012.4%(+0.165)#9,546
19.741459.5%15.8%(-6.27)#33812.4%(-2.94)#11,294
20.741337.5%15.8%(-8.25)#36812.4%(-4.92)#12,470
21.741466.0%15.8%(-9.78)#38112.4%(-6.45)#13,377
22.741041.9%15.8%(-13.9)#40712.4%(-10.6)#15,704
23.741371.8%15.8%(-13.9)#40812.4%(-10.6)#15,710

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
39.5%
#2
30.9%
#3
28.5%
#4
27.4%
#5
27.0%
#6
24.3%
#7
23.5%
#8
22.4%
#9
21.2%
#10
19.9%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
74116 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK with 39.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Tulsa is 16.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in Oklahoma is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.