Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Mother
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa

0.0%
80.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Mother Poverty vs State vs National
1.7413167.7%39.0%(+28.7)#9033.1%(+34.6)#3,333
2.7411065.6%39.0%(+26.6)#10333.1%(+32.5)#3,637
3.7412658.4%39.0%(+19.4)#14433.1%(+25.2)#4,743
4.7412758.0%39.0%(+18.9)#14933.1%(+24.8)#4,842
5.7410655.7%39.0%(+16.7)#16833.1%(+22.6)#5,300
6.7410855.1%39.0%(+16.1)#17233.1%(+22.0)#5,428
7.7414648.6%39.0%(+9.61)#23333.1%(+15.5)#7,080
8.7413048.0%39.0%(+8.94)#23933.1%(+14.8)#7,258
9.7411547.9%39.0%(+8.93)#24033.1%(+14.8)#7,264
10.7412947.9%39.0%(+8.89)#24133.1%(+14.8)#7,276
11.7410547.4%39.0%(+8.40)#24833.1%(+14.3)#7,411
12.7410745.9%39.0%(+6.93)#26133.1%(+12.8)#7,885
13.7413642.4%39.0%(+3.42)#28933.1%(+9.29)#8,937
14.7412839.5%39.0%(+0.492)#31733.1%(+6.37)#9,990
15.7414536.0%39.0%(-3.01)#35833.1%(+2.87)#11,282
16.7411235.3%39.0%(-3.67)#36633.1%(+2.21)#11,527
17.7413535.2%39.0%(-3.83)#36833.1%(+2.05)#11,602
18.7410433.5%39.0%(-5.51)#38033.1%(+0.372)#12,184
19.7411630.1%39.0%(-8.94)#40833.1%(-3.07)#13,677
20.7413728.1%39.0%(-10.9)#42533.1%(-4.99)#14,453
21.7413328.0%39.0%(-11.0)#42733.1%(-5.16)#14,534
22.7411426.1%39.0%(-12.9)#43533.1%(-7.06)#15,258
23.7413425.1%39.0%(-13.9)#43933.1%(-8.07)#15,590
24.7412015.7%39.0%(-23.3)#50233.1%(-17.4)#19,336
25.7411915.5%39.0%(-23.5)#50333.1%(-17.6)#19,394
26.7413215.3%39.0%(-23.7)#50533.1%(-17.9)#19,484

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
67.7%
#2
65.6%
#3
58.4%
#4
58.0%
#5
55.7%
#6
55.1%
#7
48.6%
#8
48.0%
#9
47.9%
#10
47.9%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
74131 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK with 67.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Tulsa is 43.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in Oklahoma is 39.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Mothers in the United States is 33.1%.