Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Illegitimacy | All Women
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa

80.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Unmarried vs State vs National
1.741373.5%32.5%(-29.0)#732.1%(-28.6)#360
2.741144.4%32.5%(-28.1)#832.1%(-27.7)#545
3.7413213.9%32.5%(-18.6)#4332.1%(-18.2)#2,832
4.7412014.8%32.5%(-17.7)#4932.1%(-17.3)#3,095
5.7412825.3%32.5%(-7.20)#10332.1%(-6.80)#5,918
6.7413326.9%32.5%(-5.60)#11432.1%(-5.20)#6,269
7.7412727.5%32.5%(-5.00)#11832.1%(-4.60)#6,447
8.7410428.2%32.5%(-4.30)#11932.1%(-3.90)#6,602
9.7414528.3%32.5%(-4.20)#12032.1%(-3.80)#6,621
10.7411629.4%32.5%(-3.10)#12632.1%(-2.70)#6,912
11.7413529.7%32.5%(-2.80)#12832.1%(-2.40)#6,981
12.7413432.4%32.5%(-0.100)#14732.1%(+0.300)#7,637
13.7412937.1%32.5%(+4.60)#17732.1%(+5.00)#8,749
14.7410537.7%32.5%(+5.20)#18332.1%(+5.60)#8,898
15.7411543.5%32.5%(+11.0)#22132.1%(+11.4)#10,229
16.7411249.3%32.5%(+16.8)#25532.1%(+17.2)#11,340
17.7410850.0%32.5%(+17.5)#25732.1%(+17.9)#11,439
18.7413050.0%32.5%(+17.5)#26232.1%(+17.9)#11,520
19.7412654.3%32.5%(+21.8)#27832.1%(+22.2)#12,216
20.7413655.3%32.5%(+22.8)#28232.1%(+23.2)#12,338
21.7410756.0%32.5%(+23.5)#28732.1%(+23.9)#12,459
22.7414657.6%32.5%(+25.1)#29532.1%(+25.5)#12,720
23.7411061.7%32.5%(+29.2)#30232.1%(+29.6)#13,261
24.7410669.4%32.5%(+36.9)#32332.1%(+37.3)#14,170
25.7413173.9%32.5%(+41.4)#34032.1%(+41.8)#14,616

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
3.5%
#4
4.4%
#5
13.9%
#6
14.8%
#7
25.3%
#8
26.9%
#9
27.5%
#10
28.2%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK?
74137 has the Lowest Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK with 3.5%.
What is the Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Tulsa is 38.6%.
What is the Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in Oklahoma is 32.5%.
What is the Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in the United States?
Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women in the United States is 32.1%.