Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Administrative & Support Services
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.7413113.7%3.6%(+10.1)#54.1%(+9.57)#650
2.7412611.3%3.6%(+7.64)#104.1%(+7.11)#967
3.7411010.6%3.6%(+6.95)#114.1%(+6.42)#1,129
4.741159.4%3.6%(+5.82)#204.1%(+5.29)#1,496
5.741297.1%3.6%(+3.50)#394.1%(+2.97)#3,061
6.741286.9%3.6%(+3.30)#434.1%(+2.77)#3,318
7.741066.5%3.6%(+2.92)#494.1%(+2.39)#3,854
8.741086.0%3.6%(+2.38)#624.1%(+1.85)#4,778
9.741305.5%3.6%(+1.89)#724.1%(+1.36)#5,826
10.741125.3%3.6%(+1.72)#804.1%(+1.19)#6,233
11.741365.1%3.6%(+1.51)#834.1%(+0.978)#6,773
12.741275.1%3.6%(+1.45)#844.1%(+0.919)#6,926
13.741454.7%3.6%(+1.11)#984.1%(+0.580)#7,938
14.741354.6%3.6%(+1.01)#1094.1%(+0.482)#8,246
15.741464.6%3.6%(+1.01)#1104.1%(+0.473)#8,296
16.741054.5%3.6%(+0.910)#1174.1%(+0.378)#8,631
17.741074.2%3.6%(+0.628)#1384.1%(+0.096)#9,645
18.741043.7%3.6%(+0.130)#1784.1%(-0.403)#11,775
19.741333.6%3.6%(-0.005)#1954.1%(-0.537)#12,411
20.741343.6%3.6%(-0.035)#2034.1%(-0.567)#12,556
21.741193.3%3.6%(-0.365)#2374.1%(-0.897)#14,191
22.741163.0%3.6%(-0.658)#2614.1%(-1.19)#15,684
23.741372.9%3.6%(-0.673)#2654.1%(-1.20)#15,765
24.741142.4%3.6%(-1.20)#3354.1%(-1.74)#18,581
25.741202.3%3.6%(-1.27)#3414.1%(-1.80)#18,934
26.741322.1%3.6%(-1.55)#3704.1%(-2.08)#20,267
27.741032.1%3.6%(-1.56)#3734.1%(-2.10)#20,355
28.741711.8%3.6%(-1.82)#4114.1%(-2.35)#21,540

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
13.7%
#2
11.3%
#3
10.6%
#4
9.4%
#5
7.1%
#6
6.9%
#7
6.5%
#8
6.0%
#9
5.5%
#10
5.3%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK?
74131 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK with 13.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Tulsa is 4.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in Oklahoma is 3.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Administrative & Support Services in the United States is 4.1%.