Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Father
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Single Father Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411659.2%17.2%(+42.0)#3713.7%(+45.4)#1,818
2.7411955.0%17.2%(+37.8)#4413.7%(+41.3)#2,037
3.7410544.0%17.2%(+26.8)#7313.7%(+30.3)#2,779
4.7412633.1%17.2%(+15.9)#11713.7%(+19.4)#3,923
5.7411030.3%17.2%(+13.2)#12613.7%(+16.6)#4,271
6.7410629.7%17.2%(+12.5)#12913.7%(+16.0)#4,374
7.7411227.4%17.2%(+10.2)#13713.7%(+13.7)#4,737
8.7413627.2%17.2%(+9.99)#14113.7%(+13.4)#4,790
9.7410827.0%17.2%(+9.79)#14213.7%(+13.2)#4,819
10.7410723.0%17.2%(+5.88)#16913.7%(+9.33)#5,586
11.7412722.8%17.2%(+5.62)#17013.7%(+9.07)#5,633
12.7411518.9%17.2%(+1.70)#19413.7%(+5.15)#6,535
13.7413415.6%17.2%(-1.55)#22013.7%(+1.90)#7,393
14.7413014.6%17.2%(-2.58)#22913.7%(+0.871)#7,666
15.7411414.5%17.2%(-2.68)#23013.7%(+0.770)#7,695
16.7412914.4%17.2%(-2.73)#23113.7%(+0.721)#7,701
17.7413514.0%17.2%(-3.21)#23513.7%(+0.241)#7,852
18.7414511.0%17.2%(-6.14)#25413.7%(-2.68)#8,784
19.741337.6%17.2%(-9.56)#27813.7%(-6.11)#10,055
20.741045.2%17.2%(-12.0)#29913.7%(-8.50)#10,949
21.741285.1%17.2%(-12.1)#30013.7%(-8.62)#10,983

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
59.2%
#2
55.0%
#3
44.0%
#4
33.1%
#5
30.3%
#6
29.7%
#7
27.4%
#8
27.2%
#9
27.0%
#10
23.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
74116 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK with 59.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Tulsa is 18.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in Oklahoma is 17.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Fathers in the United States is 13.7%.