Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1.7413059.0%20.8%(+38.1)#2617.0%(+42.0)#1,341
2.7410653.3%20.8%(+32.5)#4017.0%(+36.3)#1,748
3.7412647.2%20.8%(+26.4)#5217.0%(+30.3)#2,356
4.7411041.2%20.8%(+20.3)#7417.0%(+24.2)#3,155
5.7413140.5%20.8%(+19.7)#8317.0%(+23.6)#3,272
6.7411640.3%20.8%(+19.5)#8717.0%(+23.4)#3,311
7.7410740.3%20.8%(+19.5)#8817.0%(+23.3)#3,314
8.7411538.2%20.8%(+17.3)#10117.0%(+21.2)#3,698
9.7410837.2%20.8%(+16.4)#10717.0%(+20.3)#3,891
10.7412736.2%20.8%(+15.4)#11517.0%(+19.2)#4,110
11.7414635.9%20.8%(+15.1)#12017.0%(+18.9)#4,172
12.7412935.9%20.8%(+15.0)#12317.0%(+18.9)#4,188
13.7412832.1%20.8%(+11.3)#16117.0%(+15.1)#5,139
14.7410431.7%20.8%(+10.8)#16817.0%(+14.7)#5,269
15.7411228.4%20.8%(+7.54)#20017.0%(+11.4)#6,265
16.7413627.4%20.8%(+6.55)#21117.0%(+10.4)#6,612
17.7410523.1%20.8%(+2.27)#27017.0%(+6.13)#8,314
18.7414520.0%20.8%(-0.803)#32217.0%(+3.06)#9,825
19.7413415.0%20.8%(-5.84)#39917.0%(-1.98)#12,768
20.7413514.8%20.8%(-6.02)#40617.0%(-2.16)#12,885
21.7412012.8%20.8%(-8.00)#43917.0%(-4.14)#14,219
22.7411412.7%20.8%(-8.18)#44217.0%(-4.32)#14,348
23.7413310.6%20.8%(-10.2)#46617.0%(-6.36)#15,791
24.7413710.5%20.8%(-10.3)#46717.0%(-6.43)#15,845
25.741329.8%20.8%(-11.1)#47917.0%(-7.20)#16,416

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
59.0%
#2
53.3%
#3
47.2%
#4
41.2%
#5
40.5%
#6
40.3%
#7
40.3%
#8
38.2%
#9
37.2%
#10
36.2%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74130 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 59.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.