Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Family Poverty
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa

0.0%
30.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Family Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411028.8%11.0%(+17.8)#248.8%(+20.0)#1,455
2.7410628.4%11.0%(+17.4)#298.8%(+19.6)#1,512
3.7412626.2%11.0%(+15.2)#368.8%(+17.4)#1,800
4.7414622.6%11.0%(+11.6)#598.8%(+13.8)#2,557
5.7411521.6%11.0%(+10.6)#668.8%(+12.8)#2,844
6.7410819.7%11.0%(+8.65)#868.8%(+10.9)#3,454
7.7413019.7%11.0%(+8.64)#888.8%(+10.9)#3,457
8.7410719.1%11.0%(+8.07)#958.8%(+10.3)#3,661
9.7412719.1%11.0%(+8.06)#968.8%(+10.3)#3,667
10.7411619.0%11.0%(+7.99)#978.8%(+10.2)#3,704
11.7412918.8%11.0%(+7.83)#1038.8%(+10.1)#3,767
12.7412816.8%11.0%(+5.75)#1478.8%(+7.98)#4,804
13.7413615.0%11.0%(+4.03)#1838.8%(+6.26)#5,856
14.7411212.6%11.0%(+1.59)#2668.8%(+3.82)#7,899
15.7410512.4%11.0%(+1.43)#2708.8%(+3.66)#8,065
16.7414510.9%11.0%(-0.154)#3198.8%(+2.07)#9,797
17.741049.8%11.0%(-1.22)#3568.8%(+1.01)#11,163
18.741358.9%11.0%(-2.07)#3938.8%(+0.162)#12,390
19.741347.9%11.0%(-3.06)#4328.8%(-0.833)#14,077
20.741317.1%11.0%(-3.95)#4638.8%(-1.72)#15,631
21.741336.0%11.0%(-4.96)#4938.8%(-2.73)#17,610
22.741205.9%11.0%(-5.10)#4988.8%(-2.88)#17,919
23.741195.5%11.0%(-5.53)#5188.8%(-3.30)#18,844
24.741324.7%11.0%(-6.35)#5428.8%(-4.12)#20,721
25.741144.4%11.0%(-6.56)#5468.8%(-4.34)#21,193
26.741373.7%11.0%(-7.29)#5618.8%(-5.06)#22,741

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
28.8%
#2
28.4%
#3
26.2%
#4
22.6%
#5
21.6%
#6
19.7%
#7
19.7%
#8
19.1%
#9
19.1%
#10
19.0%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK with 28.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Families in Tulsa is 13.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Families in Oklahoma is 11.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Families in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Families in the United States is 8.8%.