Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa

0.0%
40.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411035.4%16.5%(+18.9)#2313.7%(+21.7)#1,750
2.7410634.4%16.5%(+17.9)#2913.7%(+20.7)#1,923
3.7412633.7%16.5%(+17.2)#3313.7%(+20.0)#2,035
4.7413030.7%16.5%(+14.2)#4613.7%(+17.0)#2,635
5.7411528.7%16.5%(+12.2)#6913.7%(+15.0)#3,174
6.7414628.4%16.5%(+11.9)#7513.7%(+14.7)#3,245
7.7410427.6%16.5%(+11.1)#8713.7%(+13.9)#3,493
8.7410826.3%16.5%(+9.82)#10913.7%(+12.6)#3,960
9.7410725.9%16.5%(+9.39)#11413.7%(+12.2)#4,108
10.7412824.1%16.5%(+7.57)#14813.7%(+10.4)#4,879
11.7411623.9%16.5%(+7.41)#15013.7%(+10.2)#4,965
12.7412923.7%16.5%(+7.18)#15513.7%(+9.98)#5,080
13.7412722.6%16.5%(+6.12)#17213.7%(+8.92)#5,595
14.7413620.5%16.5%(+4.04)#22013.7%(+6.84)#6,905
15.7410320.4%16.5%(+3.86)#22313.7%(+6.66)#7,014
16.7411220.0%16.5%(+3.46)#23413.7%(+6.26)#7,290
17.7410517.1%16.5%(+0.643)#31613.7%(+3.44)#9,621
18.7411916.6%16.5%(+0.068)#33713.7%(+2.87)#10,205
19.7413114.0%16.5%(-2.47)#40813.7%(+0.329)#13,000
20.7414513.9%16.5%(-2.57)#41013.7%(+0.229)#13,131
21.7413513.6%16.5%(-2.85)#41613.7%(-0.054)#13,475
22.7412013.3%16.5%(-3.22)#42913.7%(-0.424)#13,961
23.7413412.2%16.5%(-4.30)#46313.7%(-1.50)#15,396
24.741339.6%16.5%(-6.94)#52413.7%(-4.14)#19,268
25.741148.4%16.5%(-8.10)#54513.7%(-5.30)#21,164
26.741377.9%16.5%(-8.62)#55413.7%(-5.82)#21,981
27.741327.9%16.5%(-8.63)#55513.7%(-5.83)#21,994

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
35.4%
#2
34.4%
#3
33.7%
#4
30.7%
#5
28.7%
#6
28.4%
#7
27.6%
#8
26.3%
#9
25.9%
#10
24.1%
What zip code has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 35.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma is 16.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.