Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Diagnosing & Treating
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.7413211.8%6.4%(+5.40)#256.2%(+5.52)#2,342
2.7413711.2%6.4%(+4.81)#306.2%(+4.94)#2,757
3.7411410.2%6.4%(+3.83)#466.2%(+3.95)#3,645
4.741209.0%6.4%(+2.67)#726.2%(+2.80)#5,291
5.741038.7%6.4%(+2.36)#826.2%(+2.49)#5,868
6.741058.5%6.4%(+2.17)#906.2%(+2.30)#6,259
7.741337.6%6.4%(+1.20)#1236.2%(+1.33)#8,583
8.741367.5%6.4%(+1.09)#1286.2%(+1.22)#8,924
9.741047.4%6.4%(+1.03)#1336.2%(+1.16)#9,106
10.741346.9%6.4%(+0.516)#1646.2%(+0.643)#10,726
11.741356.7%6.4%(+0.304)#1736.2%(+0.430)#11,396
12.741126.2%6.4%(-0.192)#2136.2%(-0.066)#13,233
13.741316.0%6.4%(-0.411)#2266.2%(-0.285)#14,011
14.741195.9%6.4%(-0.497)#2346.2%(-0.371)#14,332
15.741075.0%6.4%(-1.33)#3076.2%(-1.21)#17,551
16.741294.9%6.4%(-1.47)#3176.2%(-1.35)#18,112
17.741454.7%6.4%(-1.67)#3366.2%(-1.55)#18,863
18.741084.6%6.4%(-1.79)#3506.2%(-1.67)#19,337
19.741164.4%6.4%(-1.99)#3696.2%(-1.87)#20,068
20.741283.6%6.4%(-2.79)#4426.2%(-2.67)#22,677
21.741273.4%6.4%(-3.02)#4576.2%(-2.89)#23,309
22.741063.3%6.4%(-3.06)#4616.2%(-2.94)#23,449
23.741302.9%6.4%(-3.43)#4876.2%(-3.30)#24,453
24.741462.8%6.4%(-3.56)#4986.2%(-3.43)#24,790
25.741102.8%6.4%(-3.57)#5006.2%(-3.44)#24,811
26.741152.5%6.4%(-3.90)#5176.2%(-3.77)#25,585
27.741262.0%6.4%(-4.34)#5306.2%(-4.21)#26,406
28.741710.36%6.4%(-6.01)#5796.2%(-5.89)#28,375

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
11.8%
#2
11.2%
#3
10.2%
#4
9.0%
#5
8.7%
#6
8.5%
#7
7.6%
#8
7.5%
#9
7.4%
#10
6.9%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK?
74132 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK with 11.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Tulsa is 6.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in Oklahoma is 6.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Diagnosing & Treating in the United States is 6.2%.