Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa

100.0%
0.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1.741030.85%65.9%(-65.1)#164.8%(-64.0)#27
2.7411924.9%65.9%(-41.1)#764.8%(-39.9)#533
3.7412033.9%65.9%(-32.1)#1064.8%(-30.9)#997
4.7414634.7%65.9%(-31.2)#1264.8%(-30.1)#1,065
5.7413636.8%65.9%(-29.1)#1564.8%(-28.0)#1,240
6.7411644.7%65.9%(-21.2)#2864.8%(-20.1)#1,999
7.7410647.0%65.9%(-18.9)#3364.8%(-17.8)#2,321
8.7410447.4%65.9%(-18.6)#3464.8%(-17.5)#2,377
9.7412949.8%65.9%(-16.2)#4064.8%(-15.0)#2,746
10.7413351.4%65.9%(-14.6)#4264.8%(-13.4)#3,042
11.7411051.4%65.9%(-14.6)#4364.8%(-13.4)#3,047
12.7413551.9%65.9%(-14.1)#4664.8%(-12.9)#3,121
13.7410752.8%65.9%(-13.2)#5064.8%(-12.1)#3,301
14.7410554.3%65.9%(-11.7)#5464.8%(-10.6)#3,601
15.7411554.8%65.9%(-11.1)#5664.8%(-9.97)#3,724
16.7411255.9%65.9%(-10.0)#6364.8%(-8.88)#4,005
17.7413256.0%65.9%(-9.90)#6464.8%(-8.78)#4,036
18.7414557.6%65.9%(-8.39)#7264.8%(-7.26)#4,426
19.7412758.0%65.9%(-7.99)#7664.8%(-6.87)#4,529
20.7412859.7%65.9%(-6.22)#8564.8%(-5.09)#5,028
21.7412660.9%65.9%(-5.04)#9164.8%(-3.92)#5,392
22.7413465.3%65.9%(-0.631)#12364.8%(+0.493)#7,211
23.7413767.8%65.9%(+1.83)#15264.8%(+2.96)#8,418
24.7410867.8%65.9%(+1.83)#15364.8%(+2.96)#8,419
25.7413069.7%65.9%(+3.79)#17364.8%(+4.91)#9,590
26.7411477.9%65.9%(+12.0)#35064.8%(+13.1)#15,980
27.7413179.1%65.9%(+13.1)#37164.8%(+14.3)#17,060
28.74117100.0%65.9%(+34.1)#64864.8%(+35.2)#32,293

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.85%
#2
24.9%
#3
33.9%
#4
34.7%
#5
36.8%
#6
44.7%
#7
47.0%
#8
47.4%
#9
49.8%
#10
51.4%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK with 0.85%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa is 52.3%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 65.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.