Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female 25-34
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa

0.0%
40.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411539.7%18.6%(+21.1)#6314.5%(+25.2)#2,753
2.7410639.3%18.6%(+20.7)#6614.5%(+24.8)#2,794
3.7411637.3%18.6%(+18.7)#7814.5%(+22.8)#3,120
4.7411034.0%18.6%(+15.4)#9314.5%(+19.5)#3,738
5.7413129.2%18.6%(+10.6)#14414.5%(+14.7)#4,945
6.7413628.8%18.6%(+10.2)#15014.5%(+14.3)#5,079
7.7414628.5%18.6%(+9.94)#15614.5%(+14.0)#5,190
8.7412928.4%18.6%(+9.77)#15914.5%(+13.9)#5,240
9.7410727.5%18.6%(+8.95)#17414.5%(+13.1)#5,498
10.7412827.4%18.6%(+8.84)#17514.5%(+12.9)#5,533
11.7411225.1%18.6%(+6.54)#20114.5%(+10.6)#6,319
12.7412724.1%18.6%(+5.55)#22014.5%(+9.65)#6,754
13.7412623.9%18.6%(+5.30)#22414.5%(+9.40)#6,848
14.7413023.3%18.6%(+4.66)#23914.5%(+8.76)#7,127
15.7410823.2%18.6%(+4.64)#24014.5%(+8.74)#7,135
16.7413421.1%18.6%(+2.49)#27014.5%(+6.59)#8,150
17.7414516.3%18.6%(-2.28)#33814.5%(+1.82)#11,103
18.7410514.1%18.6%(-4.47)#36314.5%(-0.365)#12,641
19.7412013.4%18.6%(-5.19)#38014.5%(-1.09)#13,174
20.7413512.3%18.6%(-6.26)#39914.5%(-2.16)#14,009
21.7413312.0%18.6%(-6.64)#40314.5%(-2.53)#14,304
22.7411910.6%18.6%(-7.99)#42314.5%(-3.89)#15,479
23.7410410.4%18.6%(-8.20)#42614.5%(-4.09)#15,653
24.7413210.1%18.6%(-8.49)#43214.5%(-4.39)#15,894
25.741378.4%18.6%(-10.2)#45614.5%(-6.06)#17,437
26.741035.7%18.6%(-12.9)#48814.5%(-8.78)#19,941
27.741143.4%18.6%(-15.2)#51314.5%(-11.1)#21,904

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
39.7%
#2
39.3%
#3
37.3%
#4
34.0%
#5
29.2%
#6
28.8%
#7
28.5%
#8
28.4%
#9
27.5%
#10
27.4%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
74115 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK with 39.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Tulsa is 21.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in Oklahoma is 18.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females Between Ages 25 and 34 in the United States is 14.5%.