Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Unpaid Family Workers
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa

0.0%
0.80%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Unpaid Family Workers vs State vs National
1.741300.79%0.23%(+0.561)#750.19%(+0.601)#2,466
2.741160.68%0.23%(+0.457)#910.19%(+0.496)#2,869
3.741460.64%0.23%(+0.415)#960.19%(+0.454)#3,042
4.741140.49%0.23%(+0.264)#1160.19%(+0.304)#3,924
5.741050.32%0.23%(+0.093)#1550.19%(+0.132)#5,637
6.741070.29%0.23%(+0.062)#1670.19%(+0.101)#6,106
7.741320.27%0.23%(+0.047)#1700.19%(+0.087)#6,333
8.741040.23%0.23%(+0.005)#1800.19%(+0.045)#7,021
9.741120.22%0.23%(-0.006)#1850.19%(+0.033)#7,248
10.741060.22%0.23%(-0.008)#1860.19%(+0.032)#7,268
11.741450.20%0.23%(-0.022)#1880.19%(+0.017)#7,522
12.741370.20%0.23%(-0.024)#1890.19%(+0.015)#7,561
13.741150.17%0.23%(-0.060)#2020.19%(-0.021)#8,299
14.741100.11%0.23%(-0.113)#2200.19%(-0.074)#9,593
15.741340.11%0.23%(-0.117)#2270.19%(-0.078)#9,690
16.741280.11%0.23%(-0.121)#2300.19%(-0.081)#9,799
17.741270.072%0.23%(-0.154)#2410.19%(-0.115)#10,685
18.741330.052%0.23%(-0.174)#2480.19%(-0.134)#11,182
19.741290.048%0.23%(-0.178)#2500.19%(-0.139)#11,286

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.79%
#2
0.68%
#3
0.64%
#4
0.49%
#5
0.32%
#6
0.29%
#7
0.27%
#8
0.23%
#9
0.22%
#10
0.22%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK?
74130 has the Highest Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK with 0.79%.
What is the Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Tulsa is 0.17%.
What is the Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in Oklahoma is 0.23%.
What is the Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in the United States?
Percentage of Unpaid Family Workers in the United States is 0.19%.