Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Healthcare Support
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa

0.0%
6.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.741105.6%3.0%(+2.63)#813.3%(+2.31)#5,334
2.741265.3%3.0%(+2.31)#953.3%(+1.98)#6,041
3.741064.9%3.0%(+1.95)#1163.3%(+1.63)#6,915
4.741293.9%3.0%(+0.937)#1783.3%(+0.612)#10,214
5.741463.9%3.0%(+0.901)#1803.3%(+0.577)#10,336
6.741333.8%3.0%(+0.892)#1823.3%(+0.568)#10,367
7.741073.8%3.0%(+0.871)#1843.3%(+0.547)#10,467
8.741083.2%3.0%(+0.293)#2423.3%(-0.031)#12,936
9.741273.1%3.0%(+0.143)#2643.3%(-0.182)#13,643
10.741282.9%3.0%(-0.010)#2753.3%(-0.334)#14,428
11.741152.9%3.0%(-0.086)#2883.3%(-0.410)#14,795
12.741052.8%3.0%(-0.116)#2923.3%(-0.441)#14,949
13.741302.7%3.0%(-0.267)#3093.3%(-0.591)#15,717
14.741122.6%3.0%(-0.332)#3163.3%(-0.656)#16,056
15.741452.5%3.0%(-0.414)#3373.3%(-0.739)#16,534
16.741322.5%3.0%(-0.439)#3403.3%(-0.763)#16,670
17.741352.5%3.0%(-0.443)#3413.3%(-0.767)#16,687
18.741042.3%3.0%(-0.625)#3653.3%(-0.949)#17,650
19.741362.2%3.0%(-0.783)#3823.3%(-1.11)#18,513
20.741202.1%3.0%(-0.812)#3883.3%(-1.14)#18,674
21.741161.9%3.0%(-1.04)#4153.3%(-1.37)#19,965
22.741711.5%3.0%(-1.43)#4653.3%(-1.75)#22,059
23.741371.5%3.0%(-1.44)#4683.3%(-1.77)#22,149
24.741341.5%3.0%(-1.50)#4733.3%(-1.82)#22,394
25.741191.2%3.0%(-1.74)#4943.3%(-2.07)#23,539
26.741311.0%3.0%(-1.91)#5063.3%(-2.24)#24,270
27.741141.0%3.0%(-1.95)#5093.3%(-2.27)#24,401

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
5.6%
#2
5.3%
#3
4.9%
#4
3.9%
#5
3.9%
#6
3.8%
#7
3.8%
#8
3.2%
#9
3.1%
#10
2.9%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK with 5.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Tulsa is 2.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in Oklahoma is 3.0%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Healthcare Support in the United States is 3.3%.