Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Married Couple
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa

0.0%
20.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Married Couples Poverty vs State vs National
1.7411019.8%5.7%(+14.1)#284.5%(+15.4)#1,402
2.7414616.1%5.7%(+10.3)#484.5%(+11.6)#2,010
3.7411513.3%5.7%(+7.53)#704.5%(+8.79)#2,853
4.7412612.9%5.7%(+7.22)#764.5%(+8.48)#2,972
5.7410812.8%5.7%(+7.05)#804.5%(+8.32)#3,049
6.7410612.7%5.7%(+6.97)#814.5%(+8.23)#3,087
7.7412812.3%5.7%(+6.58)#824.5%(+7.84)#3,237
8.7413011.1%5.7%(+5.38)#1054.5%(+6.65)#3,852
9.7412711.0%5.7%(+5.26)#1114.5%(+6.53)#3,954
10.741078.7%5.7%(+2.99)#1734.5%(+4.25)#5,644
11.741368.5%5.7%(+2.82)#1774.5%(+4.09)#5,805
12.741168.3%5.7%(+2.61)#1844.5%(+3.87)#5,997
13.741297.9%5.7%(+2.21)#1984.5%(+3.48)#6,429
14.741047.7%5.7%(+1.97)#2064.5%(+3.23)#6,712
15.741455.9%5.7%(+0.151)#2974.5%(+1.42)#9,515
16.741125.1%5.7%(-0.580)#3414.5%(+0.684)#10,981
17.741204.6%5.7%(-1.09)#3864.5%(+0.173)#12,146
18.741054.2%5.7%(-1.52)#4054.5%(-0.259)#13,221
19.741324.0%5.7%(-1.68)#4164.5%(-0.415)#13,643
20.741353.4%5.7%(-2.28)#4444.5%(-1.02)#15,436
21.741343.2%5.7%(-2.52)#4524.5%(-1.25)#16,156
22.741332.9%5.7%(-2.86)#4794.5%(-1.59)#17,295
23.741372.8%5.7%(-2.94)#4884.5%(-1.67)#17,583
24.741142.2%5.7%(-3.54)#5124.5%(-2.27)#19,667
25.741310.61%5.7%(-5.12)#5604.5%(-3.85)#25,092

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
19.8%
#2
16.1%
#3
13.3%
#4
12.9%
#5
12.8%
#6
12.7%
#7
12.3%
#8
11.1%
#9
11.0%
#10
8.7%
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK with 19.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Tulsa is 6.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in Oklahoma is 5.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Married Couples in the United States is 4.5%.