Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1.7410651.5%20.6%(+30.9)#3016.9%(+34.6)#1,860
2.7410350.0%20.6%(+29.4)#3716.9%(+33.1)#1,971
3.7412649.4%20.6%(+28.8)#4016.9%(+32.5)#2,077
4.7410847.4%20.6%(+26.8)#4716.9%(+30.5)#2,286
5.7411045.2%20.6%(+24.6)#5616.9%(+28.3)#2,559
6.7412741.5%20.6%(+20.9)#7016.9%(+24.6)#3,083
7.7411538.7%20.6%(+18.1)#9116.9%(+21.8)#3,601
8.7412938.5%20.6%(+17.9)#9216.9%(+21.6)#3,630
9.7413037.1%20.6%(+16.5)#10116.9%(+20.2)#3,947
10.7414636.0%20.6%(+15.4)#10616.9%(+19.1)#4,142
11.7411635.0%20.6%(+14.4)#11616.9%(+18.1)#4,379
12.7410733.7%20.6%(+13.1)#12716.9%(+16.8)#4,698
13.7413132.0%20.6%(+11.4)#15316.9%(+15.1)#5,148
14.7412827.4%20.6%(+6.82)#19416.9%(+10.5)#6,636
15.7410527.4%20.6%(+6.79)#19516.9%(+10.5)#6,640
16.7413626.9%20.6%(+6.31)#20016.9%(+10.0)#6,803
17.7410426.2%20.6%(+5.56)#21116.9%(+9.26)#7,082
18.7411225.3%20.6%(+4.67)#22616.9%(+8.37)#7,443
19.7411919.3%20.6%(-1.28)#31316.9%(+2.42)#10,267
20.7414517.8%20.6%(-2.77)#34316.9%(+0.930)#11,041
21.7413516.9%20.6%(-3.67)#35316.9%(+0.035)#11,548
22.7413416.3%20.6%(-4.29)#36016.9%(-0.587)#11,939
23.7413312.9%20.6%(-7.70)#41516.9%(-4.00)#14,188
24.7412011.4%20.6%(-9.22)#43916.9%(-5.51)#15,228
25.7411410.8%20.6%(-9.81)#44916.9%(-6.11)#15,692
26.741327.3%20.6%(-13.4)#50316.9%(-9.65)#18,722
27.741376.2%20.6%(-14.4)#51316.9%(-10.7)#19,617

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
51.5%
#2
50.0%
#3
49.4%
#4
47.4%
#5
45.2%
#6
41.5%
#7
38.7%
#8
38.5%
#9
37.1%
#10
36.0%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74106 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 51.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.