Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Male / Female Ratio
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa

0.00
400.00
Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Males / 100 Females vs State vs National
1.74103347.0199.52(+247)#598.38(+249)#252
2.74120130.5399.52(+31.0)#6498.38(+32.1)#3,335
3.74131122.2099.52(+22.7)#9698.38(+23.8)#4,646
4.74130116.1399.52(+16.6)#12798.38(+17.7)#6,231
5.74116110.2199.52(+10.7)#18098.38(+11.8)#8,557
6.74117108.3399.52(+8.81)#20098.38(+9.95)#9,519
7.74129103.9799.52(+4.45)#26498.38(+5.58)#12,577
8.74108103.7399.52(+4.21)#27098.38(+5.35)#12,778
9.74112103.6699.52(+4.14)#27198.38(+5.28)#12,835
10.74119103.2299.52(+3.70)#28098.38(+4.84)#13,229
11.74128102.7299.52(+3.20)#28798.38(+4.34)#13,686
12.74134101.4599.52(+1.93)#31098.38(+3.07)#14,893
13.74146101.2799.52(+1.75)#31698.38(+2.88)#15,065
14.74137100.7799.52(+1.25)#32298.38(+2.38)#15,544
15.7410499.7699.52(+0.240)#34098.38(+1.38)#16,625
16.7411599.0699.52(-0.459)#35698.38(+0.678)#17,370
17.7413298.9199.52(-0.606)#35798.38(+0.531)#17,539
18.7411096.2799.52(-3.25)#41198.38(-2.11)#20,338
19.7414596.1799.52(-3.35)#41698.38(-2.22)#20,456
20.7411494.6299.52(-4.90)#45798.38(-3.76)#22,053
21.7412793.0099.52(-6.52)#48898.38(-5.39)#23,678
22.7413691.8399.52(-7.69)#51098.38(-6.56)#24,706
23.7410790.8299.52(-8.70)#52498.38(-7.56)#25,521
24.7410589.8799.52(-9.65)#53598.38(-8.51)#26,209
25.7413389.8699.52(-9.66)#53698.38(-8.52)#26,214
26.7413584.1499.52(-15.4)#58298.38(-14.2)#29,084
27.7412683.9699.52(-15.6)#58498.38(-14.4)#29,143
28.7410680.7899.52(-18.7)#60298.38(-17.6)#30,078
29.7417179.9299.52(-19.6)#60698.38(-18.5)#30,273

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
347.01
#2
130.53
#3
122.20
#4
116.13
#5
110.21
#6
108.33
#7
103.97
#8
103.73
#9
103.66
#10
103.22
What zip code has the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Highest Male / Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK with 347.01.
What is the Male to Female Ratio in Tulsa, OK?
Male to Female Ratio in Tulsa is 95.82.
What is the Male to Female Ratio in Oklahoma?
Male to Female Ratio in Oklahoma is 99.52.
What is the Male to Female Ratio in the United States?
Male to Female Ratio in the United States is 98.38.