New Zealander vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
New Zealander
Tlingit-Haida
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
New Zealanders
Tlingit-Haida
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
72.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Tlingit-Haida No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,779,226 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.39% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 90.9% |
| Range | 17.7% | 90.5% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 18.5% |
| Median | 4.7% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 17.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 23.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Tlingit-Haida by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Congo (10.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (10.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |