New Zealander vs Sioux 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
New Zealander
Sioux
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
New Zealanders
Sioux
90.1%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
73.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
90.2%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Sioux 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,884,336 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 90.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,124,417 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.614 and weighted average of 90.2%, a difference of 0.17%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Sioux |
Minimum | 85.0% | 55.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 15.0% | 44.7% |
Mean | 95.6% | 89.3% |
Median | 96.8% | 93.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 93.0% | 84.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 98.4% | 95.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders and Sioux by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Uganda (90.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants (90.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Tlingit-Haida (90.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Australian (90.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bahamas (90.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Lithuania (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Chilean (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
Estonians | 85.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 90.3% |
Sudanese | 85.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 90.3% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 90.2% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 81.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 90.2% |
Sioux | 81.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 90.2% |
Bahamians | 80.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 90.2% |
Chileans | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 90.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 78.2 /100 | #148 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 76.7 /100 | #149 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 75.9 /100 | #150 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 75.4 /100 | #151 | Good 90.1% |
Tlingit-Haida | 74.3 /100 | #152 | Good 90.1% |
New Zealanders | 73.8 /100 | #153 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 73.8 /100 | #154 | Good 90.1% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 90.1% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #156 | Good 90.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 71.2 /100 | #157 | Good 90.0% |
Brazilians | 71.0 /100 | #158 | Good 90.0% |
South Africans | 69.7 /100 | #159 | Good 90.0% |