Latvian vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Immigrants from South Africa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Immigrants from South Africa
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,945,081 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 0.050%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Immigrants from South Africa |
| Minimum | 0.54% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 28.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 28.3% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 9.7% |
| Median | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 18.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Immigrants from South Africa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |