Japanese vs Maltese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Japanese
Maltese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Japanese
Maltese
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
94.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Maltese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,891,204 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,211,459 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.209 and weighted average of 9.1%, a difference of 3.6%.
![Japanese vs Maltese No Vehicles in Household](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/no-vehicle-available/japanese-vs-maltese-no-vehicle-available-chart.webp)
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Maltese |
Minimum | 3.2% | 0.26% |
Maximum | 36.9% | 13.7% |
Range | 33.7% | 13.5% |
Mean | 10.2% | 5.1% |
Median | 8.9% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 6.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Maltese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Navajo (9.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Serbian (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Netherlands (9.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Armenian (9.4%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Mexican American Indian (9.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Hispanic or Latino (9.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Laotian (9.1%, a difference of 0.48%), Spanish American (9.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and Delaware (9.2%, a difference of 0.58%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Yugoslavians | 98.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Seminole | 98.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Zimbabweans | 98.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Spanish Americans | 97.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Laotians | 97.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 97.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 97.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Delaware | 97.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 95.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Armenians | 95.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |