Immigrants from South Africa vs Tsimshian 2 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,271,221 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 56.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 56.7%, a difference of 0.12%.

2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from South Africa	Tsimshian
Minimum	41.1%	27.8%
Maximum	100.0%	78.5%
Range	58.9%	50.8%
Mean	69.1%	54.7%
Median	69.0%	55.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	61.1%	50.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	73.1%	63.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.0%	13.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	14.1%	12.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	13.9%	12.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Tsimshian by 2 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.090%), New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Sioux (56.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are New Zealander (56.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Australian (56.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (56.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Thailand (56.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (56.6%, a difference of 0.13%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	2 or more Vehicles in Household
Zimbabweans	96.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 57.2%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	96.8 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 57.2%
Chippewa	96.6 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 57.2%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.6 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 57.2%
Iraqis	95.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 57.1%
Asians	95.1 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 57.0%
Natives/Alaskans	95.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 57.0%
Costa Ricans	94.7 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 56.9%
Sioux	93.8 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 56.8%
Immigrants \| South Africa	92.5 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 56.7%
Australians	91.8 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 56.7%
New Zealanders	91.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 56.7%
Tsimshian	91.6 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 56.7%
Estonians	90.9 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 56.6%
Immigrants \| Thailand	90.7 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 56.6%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 56.6%
Ute	90.4 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 56.6%
Yugoslavians	90.0 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 56.6%
Bulgarians	89.7 /100 \| #131	Excellent 56.5%
Hungarians	89.1 /100 \| #132	Excellent 56.5%
Comanche	88.4 /100 \| #133	Excellent 56.5%