Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chilean 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,674,043 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.601 and weighted average of 89.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,602,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.364 and weighted average of 90.2%, a difference of 0.34%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Chilean
Minimum	85.0%	81.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	15.0%	18.4%
Mean	91.6%	93.6%
Median	91.1%	93.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	89.7%	90.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	92.3%	97.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.5%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.8%	4.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.8%	4.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa and Chileans by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (89.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (89.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Austria (89.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (89.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (90.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (90.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (90.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Micronesia (90.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (90.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Bahamians	80.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent 90.2%
Chileans	79.8 /100 \| #147	Good 90.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	78.2 /100 \| #148	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	76.7 /100 \| #149	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	75.9 /100 \| #150	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	75.4 /100 \| #151	Good 90.1%
Tlingit-Haida	74.3 /100 \| #152	Good 90.1%
New Zealanders	73.8 /100 \| #153	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	73.8 /100 \| #154	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	73.6 /100 \| #155	Good 90.1%
Australians	72.4 /100 \| #156	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Congo	71.2 /100 \| #157	Good 90.0%
Brazilians	71.0 /100 \| #158	Good 90.0%
South Africans	69.7 /100 \| #159	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	68.8 /100 \| #160	Good 90.0%
Salvadorans	68.7 /100 \| #161	Good 90.0%
Spanish American Indians	67.0 /100 \| #162	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	65.5 /100 \| #163	Good 89.9%
Comanche	63.4 /100 \| #164	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	62.6 /100 \| #165	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	62.2 /100 \| #166	Good 89.9%