Czechoslovakian vs South African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
South African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Czechoslovakians
South Africans
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
61.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs South African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,340,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.777 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 30.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | South African |
Minimum | 0.79% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 16.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 15.7% | 98.5% |
Mean | 6.2% | 10.5% |
Median | 5.5% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 20.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 19.6% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Comanche (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |