Czechoslovakian vs Finnish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Finnish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Finns
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Finnish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,718,828 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 403,316,367 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Finns and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 7.7%, a difference of 2.0%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Finnish |
| Minimum | 0.79% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 16.4% | 15.8% |
| Range | 15.7% | 15.3% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 6.5% |
| Median | 5.5% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Finns by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.10%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Creek (7.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Finns are Native Hawaiian (7.7%, a difference of 0.15%), American (7.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Malaysian (7.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Taiwan (7.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and Samoan (7.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Yaqui | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 7.5% |
| Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| British | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 7.6% |
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Finns | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |