Bhutanese vs Osage 4 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Osage
4 or more Vehicles in Household
4 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bhutanese
Osage
7.8%
4 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
4 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Osage 4 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,167,793 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of households with 4 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 7.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,747,496 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of households with 4 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.617 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.38%.
4 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Osage |
| Minimum | 0.93% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 21.7% | 47.8% |
| Range | 20.7% | 45.7% |
| Mean | 9.9% | 14.6% |
| Median | 9.3% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Osage by 4 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 4 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Choctaw (7.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Crow (7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Fijian (7.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Salvadoran (7.8%, a difference of 0.38%), and Swiss (7.8%, a difference of 0.56%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Crow (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Swiss (7.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Choctaw (7.8%, a difference of 0.33%), Cherokee (7.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (7.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 4 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Sioux | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Spanish Americans | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Spanish | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Pima | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Choctaw | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Crow | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Osage | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Japanese | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Malaysians | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 7.6% |