Bahamian vs Comanche No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bahamian
Comanche
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bahamians
Comanche
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
60.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Comanche No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,677,271 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Comanche |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 15.8% |
| Range | 20.5% | 14.5% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 7.1% |
| Median | 8.7% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Comanche by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Uganda (10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and Colombian (10.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.52%), New Zealander (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |