Bahamian vs Spanish American Indian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Bahamian
Spanish American Indian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Bahamians
Spanish American Indians
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
145th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bahamian vs Spanish American Indian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,549,845 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bahamians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.221 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,126,627 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bahamian | Spanish American Indian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 18.0% |
| Range | 20.5% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 8.0% |
| Median | 8.7% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.2% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Bahamians and Spanish American Indians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Bahamians are Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (9.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are Australian (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Micronesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Salvadoran (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Sioux (10.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |