Zimbabwean vs Thai Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Thai
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Zimbabweans
Thais
4.8%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Thai Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,161,381 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,148,308 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.508 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 4.1%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 10.2% | 6.2% |
| Range | 8.4% | 5.8% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 3.8% |
| Median | 4.4% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.2% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Thais by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Dutch (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Tongan (4.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Carpatho Rusyn (4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (4.8%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Cuban (4.6%, a difference of 0.60%), Swedish (4.6%, a difference of 0.81%), Luxembourger (4.5%, a difference of 1.2%), Czech (4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (4.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.8% |