Zimbabwean vs Thai In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Thai
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Thais
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Thai In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,654 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416 and weighted average of 81.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,903,874 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.332 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 0.050%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Thai |
Minimum | 65.2% | 74.7% |
Maximum | 88.9% | 91.6% |
Range | 23.7% | 16.9% |
Mean | 81.1% | 82.2% |
Median | 81.7% | 82.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 79.5% | 80.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.0% | 83.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Thais by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bulgarian (81.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nepal (81.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (80.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (80.8%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 81.5% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 81.5% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 81.3% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 80.7% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 80.7% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 80.7% |