Ute vs Chippewa Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Chippewa
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Ute
Chippewa
16.9%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Chippewa Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,697 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,014,776 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.606 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 7.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 66.0% | 71.1% |
| Range | 64.0% | 63.0% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 24.2% |
| Median | 15.9% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.9% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.4% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.5% | 16.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.0% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Chippewa by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Kiowa (16.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Paiute (16.7%, a difference of 0.96%), Central American Indian (16.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Yakama (16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and Colville (16.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Cajun (15.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.39%), Seminole (15.6%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Grenada (15.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and Immigrants from Somalia (15.8%, a difference of 0.72%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 15.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 15.9% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 17.3% |