Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Tsimshian
Immigrants from Middle Africa
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
23.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
20.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,620,666 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,480,571 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 0.20%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 13.3% | 13.8% |
| Range | 10.9% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 5.6% |
| Median | 6.7% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 6.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Alsatian (5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Spaniard (5.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Iroquois (5.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Hawaiian (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Costa Ricans | 33.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
| Ugandans | 31.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
| Cherokee | 30.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
| Portuguese | 28.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Arabs | 27.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.3% |
| Colombians | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 26.2 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.3% |
| Spaniards | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.3% |
| Alsatians | 23.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.3% |
| Tsimshian | 23.1 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Hawaiians | 22.2 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Soviet Union | 21.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 20.8 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Iroquois | 20.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |