Japanese vs Immigrants from Asia Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,299,212 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.480 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,655,356 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and unemployment rate among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.001 and weighted average of 8.3%, a difference of 0.020%.

Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Japanese	Immigrants from Asia
Minimum	2.8%	1.8%
Maximum	22.2%	21.3%
Range	19.4%	19.5%
Mean	9.2%	9.1%
Median	8.2%	8.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.8%	6.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	12.1%	10.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	6.2%	4.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.7%	3.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.6%	3.5%

Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Asia by Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years

In terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Croatia (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Russia (8.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Nepal (8.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Greece (8.3%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Immigrants from Croatia (8.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Russia (8.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Nepal (8.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (8.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Thai (8.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Seniors over 75 years
Immigrants \| Lebanon	98.8 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 8.2%
Marshallese	98.7 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 8.2%
French American Indians	98.7 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 8.2%
Immigrants \| India	98.6 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 8.2%
Asians	98.5 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 8.3%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	98.4 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 8.3%
Sudanese	98.2 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| West Indies	98.1 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Greece	97.9 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	97.9 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 8.3%
Japanese	97.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Asia	97.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Croatia	97.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	96.9 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 8.3%
Thais	96.8 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 8.3%
Immigrants \| Moldova	96.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 8.3%
Belizeans	96.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 8.4%
Hondurans	96.2 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 8.4%
Native Hawaiians	96.1 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 8.4%
Ghanaians	96.0 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 8.4%