Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs White/Caucasian Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
White/Caucasian
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Whites/Caucasians
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs White/Caucasian Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,690,630 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,814,917 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.890 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.060%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 16.5% | 12.8% |
Range | 14.6% | 9.0% |
Mean | 5.7% | 6.3% |
Median | 4.7% | 5.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Whites/Caucasians by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Serbian (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Cuba (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Cuba (4.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Serbian (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Eastern Europeans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Greeks | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Austrians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |