Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Choctaw
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Choctaw Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,690,630 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,280,728 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 10.6%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 31.9% |
| Range | 14.6% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 7.2% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Serbian (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Okinawans | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Ottawa (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Korean (5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Samoan (5.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 20.3 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 19.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 18.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
| Creek | 15.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 13.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.4% |
| Koreans | 13.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.4% |
| Choctaw | 12.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.4% |
| Ottawa | 11.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 11.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.4% |
| Samoans | 10.6 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.4% |
| Seminole | 10.3 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 10.2 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.4% |
| Comanche | 10.0 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.4% |
| Peruvians | 9.6 /100 | #217 | Tragic 5.4% |