Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Celtic Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Celtic
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Celtics
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Celtic Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,690,630 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,426,082 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Celtic |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.40% |
| Maximum | 16.5% | 19.4% |
| Range | 14.6% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 6.3% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 3.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Celtics by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Moldova (4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Serbian (4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (4.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Slavic (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and Cambodian (4.9%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Belgium (4.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Canada (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nepal (4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from North America (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Australians | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Slavs | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Serbians | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Icelanders | 98.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Bhutanese | 98.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 98.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 98.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Celtics | 98.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | North America | 98.3 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Hungarians | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Cubans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 98.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 4.9% |