Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Sri Lanka
Immigrants from China
5.1%
UNEMPLOYMENT
91.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,679,955 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sri Lanka and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 2.0%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Sri Lanka | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 8.4% | 8.2% |
| Range | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| Mean | 4.5% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sri Lanka are Immigrants from Western Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ireland (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from France (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 93.3 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 93.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Chileans | 93.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| South Africans | 92.6 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 91.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 91.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 91.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 90.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 89.7 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Macedonians | 89.7 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Lebanese | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 89.1 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Asians | 89.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |