Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from China Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from China
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from China
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
74.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from China Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,836,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,493,067 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.181 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 8.2% |
| Range | 7.2% | 6.6% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.0% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Immigrants from China by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |
| Spanish | 65.1 /100 | #162 | Good 5.2% |