Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from Ethiopia
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,659,649 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,215,885 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.66%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from Ethiopia |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.40% |
Maximum | 12.7% | 9.4% |
Range | 11.7% | 9.0% |
Mean | 5.0% | 5.3% |
Median | 4.8% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Ethiopia by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Nicaraguan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Ukrainian (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Mongolian (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from England (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 91.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 91.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 91.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | England | 90.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 90.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 90.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 90.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Romanians | 89.8 /100 | #114 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 89.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 89.4 /100 | #116 | Excellent 5.1% |
Estonians | 89.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 5.1% |
Cypriots | 88.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 5.1% |
French Canadians | 88.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ukrainians | 88.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
Mongolians | 88.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
Nicaraguans | 88.2 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 87.7 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 87.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |