Immigrants from Latvia vs Ethiopian Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Ethiopian
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Ethiopians
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
87.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Ethiopian Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,659,649 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.008 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,844,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.62%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 12.7% | 10.8% |
| Range | 11.7% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 5.0% | 5.3% |
| Median | 4.8% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Ethiopians by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Nicaraguan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Ukrainian (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Mongolian (5.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from England (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 91.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 91.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 91.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 90.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 90.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 90.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 90.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Romanians | 89.8 /100 | #114 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 89.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 89.4 /100 | #116 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Estonians | 89.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Cypriots | 88.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 5.1% |
| French Canadians | 88.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ukrainians | 88.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Mongolians | 88.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 88.2 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 87.7 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 87.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |