Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Ethiopian Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Ethiopian
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Ethiopians
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
91.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
91.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Ethiopian Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,215,885 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,844,986 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Range | 9.0% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 5.3% | 5.3% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia and Ethiopians by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Chile (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from England (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Asians | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 93.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 93.3 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Uruguayans | 93.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Russians | 92.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| German Russians | 92.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 92.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 91.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 91.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 91.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 91.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 90.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 90.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 90.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 90.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Romanians | 89.8 /100 | #114 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 89.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 89.4 /100 | #116 | Excellent 5.1% |