Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Eastern Europe
Immigrants from Hong Kong
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
75.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,836,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Europe and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,937,877 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.010%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Eastern Europe | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 10.7% |
| Range | 7.2% | 9.9% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.0% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.84% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Europe are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Egyptian (5.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (5.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Palestinians | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 83.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 82.8 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indonesians | 82.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 81.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 81.8 /100 | #146 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 81.6 /100 | #147 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 5.1% |
| Syrians | 77.7 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
| Potawatomi | 76.2 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 75.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 75.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
| Egyptians | 75.2 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | China | 74.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.4 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
| Sri Lankans | 69.5 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 66.7 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 66.6 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |
| Laotians | 66.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 65.2 /100 | #161 | Good 5.2% |