Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from China
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from North America
Immigrants from China
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from North America vs Immigrants from China Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,351,855 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.749 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,907,220 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.451 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.49%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from North America | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 22.2% |
Range | 97.7% | 21.2% |
Mean | 18.1% | 7.5% |
Median | 12.1% | 6.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.0% | 8.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.3% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America and Immigrants from China by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Europe (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Latvia (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Ukrainian (7.9%, a difference of 0.12%), English (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Irish (7.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Austrian (7.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Romania (7.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Cambodian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Croatia (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Canada (7.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Dutch | 98.3 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Northern Europeans | 98.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Australians | 98.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 98.2 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Cambodians | 98.2 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Austrians | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | China | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.1 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 98.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Ukrainians | 98.0 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |