Yugoslavian vs Sierra Leonean Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Sierra Leonean
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Sierra Leoneans
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Sierra Leonean Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,419,123 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.070%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Sierra Leonean |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.2% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 52.9% |
Range | 64.4% | 49.7% |
Mean | 15.4% | 14.5% |
Median | 12.3% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 8.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Sierra Leoneans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from France (12.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Panama (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |
Vietnamese | 67.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.7% |
Latvians | 67.9 /100 | #157 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 64.9 /100 | #158 | Good 12.7% |