Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Immigrants from Western Asia
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Immigrants from Western Asia
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
83.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Western Asia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 356,365,100 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Asia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.77%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yugoslavian | Immigrants from Western Asia |
Minimum | 2.3% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 31.2% |
Range | 64.4% | 30.1% |
Mean | 15.4% | 13.9% |
Median | 12.3% | 12.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 19.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Immigrants from Western Asia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Asia are Immigrants from Northern Europe (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Salvadoran (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ecuador (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 84.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 83.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.5% |
Salvadorans | 83.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 83.4 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 82.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 81.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 81.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.5% |
Ukrainians | 80.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.6% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 80.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.6% |
Cubans | 79.9 /100 | #139 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 78.0 /100 | #140 | Good 12.6% |
Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |