Yugoslavian vs Czechoslovakian Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
 Czechoslovakian
 Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Czechoslovakians
29.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
36.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
16.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Czechoslovakian Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,794,338 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 29.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 358,570,470 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.177 and weighted average of 29.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
 
Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Czechoslovakian | 
| Minimum | 2.5% | 10.8% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 97.5% | 89.2% | 
| Mean | 33.4% | 47.5% | 
| Median | 29.7% | 38.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.0% | 30.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.0% | 61.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.0% | 30.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.6% | 23.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 23.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Czechoslovakians by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Ghanaian (29.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (29.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Guamanian/Chamorro (29.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Africa (29.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Germany (29.5%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants (29.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Swiss (29.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (29.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Belgian (29.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Panamanian (29.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty | 
| Ghanaians | 36.8 /100 | #185  | Fair 29.4%  | 
| Yugoslavians | 36.0 /100 | #186  | Fair 29.4%  | 
| Lebanese | 32.5 /100 | #187  | Fair 29.4%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 31.8 /100 | #188  | Fair 29.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 31.6 /100 | #189  | Fair 29.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Germany | 30.4 /100 | #190  | Fair 29.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 29.2 /100 | #191  | Fair 29.5%  | 
| Moroccans | 28.6 /100 | #192  | Fair 29.5%  | 
| Basques | 28.3 /100 | #193  | Fair 29.5%  | 
| Icelanders | 26.1 /100 | #194  | Fair 29.5%  | 
| Slavs | 24.5 /100 | #195  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 23.4 /100 | #196  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 22.0 /100 | #197  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.7 /100 | #198  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Cubans | 20.8 /100 | #199  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Panamanians | 20.0 /100 | #200  | Fair 29.6%  | 
| Belgians | 18.8 /100 | #201  | Poor 29.7%  | 
| Malaysians | 17.4 /100 | #202  | Poor 29.7%  | 
| Swiss | 17.2 /100 | #203  | Poor 29.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 16.6 /100 | #204  | Poor 29.7%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 16.1 /100 | #205  | Poor 29.7%  |