White/Caucasian vs Ute Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Ute
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Ute
14.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Ute Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 478,066,159 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,243,903 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.584 and weighted average of 15.7%, a difference of 8.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | White/Caucasian | Ute |
Minimum | 11.1% | 11.8% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 19.0% | 88.2% |
Mean | 15.6% | 45.2% |
Median | 14.8% | 37.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 19.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 62.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 42.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 31.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 30.4% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Ute by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Dominica (14.5%, a difference of 0.090%), U.S. Virgin Islander (14.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Bahamian (14.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and Nonimmigrants (14.6%, a difference of 0.60%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Pennsylvania German (15.6%, a difference of 0.75%), Blackfeet (15.5%, a difference of 1.2%), Alaska Native (15.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Aleut (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and Alsatian (15.2%, a difference of 2.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 14.5% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 14.5% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 14.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 14.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 14.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 14.6% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 14.7% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 14.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 14.8% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 15.0% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 15.0% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 15.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 15.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 15.2% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 15.4% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |